Anthropocentrism and the Continental Tradition: Calarco’s Zoographies. Matthew Calarco, Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida. Calarco (California State Univ., Fullerton) examines the question of the animal in major Continental thinkers like Heidegger, Levinas, Agamben, and Derrida. Matthew Calarco draws on ethological and evolutionary evidence and the work of Heidegger, who called for a radicalized responsibility toward all forms of life.
|Published (Last):||5 June 2017|
|PDF File Size:||2.30 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.85 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Jean-Paul Sartre and Morality. Simon Critchley – – In David Wood ed.
No, cancel Yes, report it Thanks! No trivia or quizzes yet. Mar 03, Mattomic marked it as to-read Shelves: Allison rated it really liked it Dec 06, There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Christine Roth rated it really liked it Apr 04, Lonergan in the World. John Llewelyn – – Research in Phenomenology 40 2: Animal Rights, Multiculturalism, and the Left. Joanna rated it really liked it Jul 07, Ricoeur and the Post-Structuralists. Columbia University Press I especially appreciated Calarco’s thorough and well-considered essay on Derrida, and how he asked the kinds of questions of this and other philosophers that analytic philosophy and those demanding a more obviously directive ethic sometimes feel that such philosophy frustrates: The Time of Our Lives.
Close Report a review At Kobo, we try to ensure that published reviews do not contain rude or profane language, spoilers, or any of our reviewer’s personal information. Ratings and Reviews 0 0 star ratings 0 reviews. Calarco’s book is a mercifully clear and thoughtfully compiled series of essays on the ways Heidegger Levinas, Agamben, and Derrida approach “the question of the animal”.
Contents Metaphysical Anthropocentrism Heidegger. Fredrik Svenaeus – – Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 3: Matthew Calarco draws on ethological and evolutionary evidence and the work of Heidegger, who called for a radicalized responsibility toward all forms of life.
Self-Consciousness and the Critique of the Subject. He admits, however, that although these post-Enlightenment The Time of the Animal.
Lists with This Book. Olivia rated it it was ok Mar 12, He also turns to Levinas, who raised questions about the nature and scope of ethics; Agamben, who held the “anthropological machine” responsible for the horrors of the twentieth century; and Derrida, who initiated a nonanthropocentric ethics.
Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Your display name should be at least 2 characters long. Antipositivist Theories of the Sciences. The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida. Calarco’s basic thesis is that this binary is no longer defendable, forever destroyed by the sciences and humanities. Matt rated it it was amazing May 15, Thanks for telling us about the problem. Matthew Calarco – – Continental Philosophy Review 37 2: The Rhetorical Foundations Of Society.
Philosophy in Turbulent Times.
Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida by Matthew Calarco
Danilo Caputo rated it liked it Jun 08, Added to PP index Total downloads 14of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 6 91, aoographies 2, How can I increase my downloads? Account Options Sign in.
Moral Images of Freedom. Calarco California State Univ. Theory of the Political Subject. Been a few months since I finished it, but I remember zoograpihes to highly recommend it for anyone doing work in animal theory. We’ll publish them on our site once we’ve reviewed them.
Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida
Humanism, Subjectivity, and Animal Ethics. Zoographhies, get it for Kobo Super Points! You can read this item using any of the following Kobo apps and devices: Columbia University Press Amazon. What is an Organ?
Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Social Theory Since Freud. Overall rating No ratings yet 0. Zoographies challenges the anthropocentrism of the Continental philosophical tradition and advances the position that, while some distinctions are valid, humans and animals are best viewed as part of an ontological whole. The Question of the Zoographirs